Lunds Fordonstekniska gymnasium in Lund
Part of group: Lilla Park och Min Skola AB
Headmaster: Daniela Cvetanovski
37
Skolkoll Score 37 out of 100. The scale goes from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). 50 is the average. Better than 7% of Sweden’s upper secondary schools.below the national midpointShows where a school sits within a comparison group. Percentile 80 means the school ranks above roughly 80 percent of that group.Compared to all upper-secondary schools nationally
A composite of five open data sources — a starting point, not a grade.
Data coverageMedium3/5
Why this score?
Skolkoll score is Skolkoll's composite indicator based on available data sources. It is not an official quality measure and should be read together with the underlying data.
3 of 5 score dimensions have school-specific data.
When school-specific data is missing for a dimension, the neutral value 50 is used. That does not automatically lower the school, but it makes the score less informative.
Lunds Fordonstekniska gymnasium is a small group-operated upper secondary school with 80 pupils.
Lunds Fordonstekniska gymnasium is a small group-operated upper secondary school with 80 pupils.
- 80PupilsMunicipality: 10,820High reliability
- 11.7Graduation gradeMunicipality: 14.6 · Sweden: 13.8Moderate reliability
- 13.0Pupils per teacherMunicipality: 14.5 · Sweden: 12.1High reliability
- 149,650 SEKCost per pupil (municipal avg.)Sweden: 144,179 SEKLimited history
See how schools in Lund rank →
The most important facts in 3 points
- Upper secondary school in Lund with 80 pupils.
- The latest inspection (2026) has no recorded deficiencies in our data.
- Applying? Go to the school's application link on this page.
Skolkoll interpretation
Lunds Fordonstekniska gymnasium is compared here with 16 other schools with the same school form in Lund municipality; it has 80 pupils versus the municipal average of 637.
The average graduation grade is 11.7, 2.9 points below the municipal average and 2.1 points below the national average.
Pupils per teacher is 13.0, 1.5 lower than the municipal average.
Apply for a place? Use Lund e-service for upper-secondary application (opens in a new window).
Certified teachers and Eligible for higher education need extra caution
This applies only to the values listed here.
This value is missing in full or in part.
This affects
- Certified teachers
- Eligible for higher education
- This staffing metric is affected by FTE definitions, local reporting practices, and temporary vacancies.
- This result metric can be affected by privacy suppression, small cohorts, and changes in pupil composition between years.
Other values here do not have this specific note.
School programmes
- Upper secondary school
Things to look into
No clear flag.
No clear attention flags from key-figure deviations or the School Inspectorate's public register. Detailed inspection history is shown in the "Safety & Inspection" card below.
School profile
The school's strengths compared with all upper-secondary schools nationally.
- Grade pointsP7
- Pupil-teacher ratioP39
- Graduated within 3 yearsP41
Source: Skolverket, Swedish Schools Inspectorate.
Aerial view of the school
Aerial view of the school's surroundings. The property is marked from the register; building use has not been verified. Updated 2026. Source: Lantmäteriet · CC BY 4.0
Entrances:1 Lund, Fältspatvägen 2, Lund
School performance
Results
11.7Avg. graduation gradeSweden: 13.8
Results
11.7
Avg. graduation grade
Average graduation grade is 2.1 points below the national average.
Admission scores per programme
| Programme | Avg. | Sweden | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fordons- och transportprogrammet | 100 | — |
Lowest admitted merit score from latest admission round. Smaller programmes (under 20 places) have larger year-to-year variation.
After graduation (3 years)
| Outcome | Share |
|---|---|
| Studying in higher education | 0.0% |
Source: Skolverket Statistikdatabasen (per school unit, 3 years after graduation). Rows are independent outcome metrics and do not sum to 100%. One-year follow-up and a university-vs-other-studies split are not published in open data per school.
Moderate reliability — Mixed sources: results reported directly by the school operator; post-graduation outcomes (3 years) from Skolverket Statistikdatabasen.
Staff
13.0Pupils per teacherMunicipality: 14.5 · Sweden: 12.1
Staff
13.0
Pupils per teacher
Staff data reported by the school operator.
High reliability — Reported directly by the school operator.
School environment
Safety & Inspection
1 openRecently inspected 2026Safety index: 57 / 100
Safety & Inspection
1 open
Recently inspected 2026
1 open remark(s) from the Schools Inspectorate.
- Latest inspection decision Reliability: High reliability.
- 2026-04-07 — Riktad tillsyn Uppföljning skolbeslut Gymnasieskola Lund Lunds Fordonstekniska Gymn., 2026 (pdf, 233 kB)
- Open remarks Reliability: High reliability.
- 1
- Safety index Reliability: High reliability.
- 57 / 100Safety: 70% · Study peace: 41% · Anti-bullying: 54%
Safety index
57/ 100(High data coverage)
- Safety70%(national 84)
- Study peace41%(national 64)
- Anti-bullying54%(national 63)
School Survey — all perspectives
| Dimension | Pupils (gy 2) | Guardian | Staff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | 7.0 / 10 | — | — |
| Study environment | 4.1 / 10 | — | — |
| Anti-bullying | 5.4 / 10 | — | — |
| Stimulation | 4.9 / 10 | — | — |
| Support | 6.0 / 10 | — | — |
Scale 0–10 (rescaled from Skolverket's 0–100). Guardian and staff perspectives are often not in open data.
High reliability — Inspection register and Skolenkäten survey.
Source: Schools Inspectorate + Skolverket · Last updated: 5 Jul 2026
Resources
149,650 SEKCost per pupil (total)Sweden: 144,179 SEK
Resources
149,650 SEK
Cost per pupil (total)
Cost per pupil is 4% above the national average.
Limited history — Cost data updated annually by Kolada/SCB.
Who runs the school
Operator
Lilla Park och Min Skola ABGroup operator182 other schools in the municipality.
Operator
Lilla Park och Min Skola AB
Group operator
Lilla Park och Min Skola AB operates this school as part of a larger concern.
- Operator Reliability: High reliability.
- Lilla Park och Min Skola AB
- Operating form Reliability: High reliability.
- Group-operated
- Concern (parent organisation) Reliability: High reliability.
- Lilla Park och Min Skola AB
- Concern org. number Reliability: High reliability.
- 5564559523
- Other schools in municipality Reliability: High reliability.
- 182
High reliability — Current data from Skolverket and Bolagsverket.
Source: Skolverket · Last updated: 5 Jul 2026
Next step: Apply for a place
Apply through Lund e-service for upper-secondary application.
Contact and address
- Headmaster
- Daniela Cvetanovski
- Visiting address
- Fältspatvägen 2, 22478 Lund
- Postal address
- c/o C/o Cedergrenska AB, Box 16391, 10327 STOCKHOLM
- Phone
- 046-151685
- info@lftg.se
- Website
- www.lftg.se/
- School unit code
28848709
Source: Skolverket School Unit Register · Pipeline-fetched on 2026-07-05.
Everyday travelAreas that reach the school within 15 minutes.
Reachability from the school
15 min on foot
15 min by bike
School
Daily-life profile
Everyday life at the school
Everyday facts are shown with a source where available. Fields not yet collected are listed together and do not affect score or ranking.
Not collected yet: School day times, After-school care, Language choices, Food and dining, Facilities and outdoor environment, Homework and study support. Suggest an addition →
Nearest and similar schools
- Flyinge Hästsportgymnasium10 km away· 90 pupils
- Kometskolan Introduktionsprogram6 km away· 30 pupils
- Hvilangymnasiet8 km away· 40 pupils
About Lund municipality
School-form averages across the municipality, with links to deep-dive sub-pages.
- Schools
- 183
- Avg. merit (yr 9)
- 250.8+23.1
- Certified teachers
- 80%+6 pp
- Pupils per teacher
- 12.9+0.9
Source: Skolverket (aggregated school statistics).
Similar schools
The 5 most-similar upper secondary schools based on student count, geography, teacher certification and pupil composition.
★ Watch Lunds Fordonstekniska gymnasium
Get email when new statistics are published, merit value changes significantly or the School Inspectorate makes a new decision.
Want to dig deeper?
The Data view shows complete history, sources, methodology and CSV export.
In-depth metrics
Staff stability
Improving
Source: Kolada (municipality-aggregated certified teacher trend).
Safety and study environment (SkolenkätenThe Schools Inspectorate’s survey sent to pupils, parents, and staff about safety, classroom order, and teaching.Read more in glossary →)
The school survey shows pupil experience where responses are available. Read values together with year, response coverage and unknowns.
Coverage: 1 displayed year group · year 2026.
Strongest (Upper-sec. year 2)
- Safety: 70 (national 84)
- Support: 60 (national 67)
Weakest (Upper-sec. year 2)
- Study environment: 41 (national 64)
- Stimulation: 49 (national 61)
Support-needs policy · School-choice guide
Source: Skolinspektionen Skolenkäten 2026. Updated annually. · See all years and dimensions in the data view →
School meals
Weekly menus and meal provider for this school's municipality.
No menu provider registered for this municipality yet.
Source: municipality's own meal portal — Skolkoll does not host menu content.
Inspections & decisions
Source: Skolinspektionen tillsynsregister (open data). Updated when new decisions are published. · See all decisions and review types in the data view → · Check current status at the Schools Inspectorate ↗
Admissions pressure & cutoffs
Applicants per place and latest admission cutoff per programme (2026).
High demand reflects popularity, which depends on location and reputation as well as quality. Cutoffs measure entry difficulty, not school quality.
- Fordons- och transportprogrammet100points
- Introduktionsprogram IM
- Introduktionsprogram IM Yrkesintro
Source: Gymnasieantagningen (regional admission databases). Latest year: 2026.
Graduation rate within 3 years
81%graduate within 3 years
Not graduated19%
vs national avg.In line with national average (82%)
vs Lund (GY avg.)4 percentage points below Lund (GY graduation average) (85%)
Source: Skolverket (graduation rate within 3 years). Updated annually.
Explore further
More context about Lunds Fordonstekniska gymnasium, its municipality, operator and similar schools.
Upper secondary schools in LundSee all upper secondary schools in the municipality with graduation rates.Schools in LundOpen the municipality page with all schools, rankings, and local aggregates.Lunds Fordonstekniska Gymnasium ABSee all schools, municipalities, and core metrics for the same provider.Lilla Park och Min Skola ABOpen the full school-group page with providers, municipalities, and group totals.Skåne länCompare municipalities and school patterns across the whole county.Upper secondary schoolsGet the national upper-secondary overview of school size and outcomes.Cost vs ResultsCompare outcomes and resource levels across municipalities and school markets.Compare schoolsBuild a side-by-side comparison with the schools you care about.
Data coverage
What we do not know about Lunds Fordonstekniska gymnasium
Open school data is not complete. Use this as a checklist for what to verify with the school, provider or municipality.
- MediumResults and score inputsMedium data coverage: 3 of 5 score dimensions have school-specific data. When school-specific data is missing for a dimension, the neutral value 50 is used. That does not automatically lower the school, but it makes the score less informative.
- MediumEligibility and goal attainmentGrades, eligibility and goal-attainment data may be missing, suppressed or available only for some grades and school types.
- UncertainResources, teachers and staffTeacher and resource metrics do not always show subject mix, vacancies, student-health workflows or everyday staffing.
- MissingSupport resources and student healthWe do not yet have a verified national data source for special education, student health, adaptations, language support or contact routes per school.
- PartialSafety and study environmentThe school survey is shown where available, but not every grade and perspective is always covered.
- PartialAdmissions, placement and important datesAdmission data is available for upper-secondary programmes where sources publish it, but it is historical and not a forecast.
- MissingVisits, facilities and everyday environmentWe lack sourced open-house information for this school. Facilities, accessibility and everyday environment are often not open comparable data.
For the school: get your Skolkoll badge
Work at this school? Embed an image showing the school's Skolkoll score that links to the full profile. The image is served from Skolkoll's image host and updates when we publish a new badge for the school.
See Data view for full sources and fetch dates per source.
