Analysis

Satisfaction vs Results

Do students thrive in municipalities with high grades — or are they forced to sacrifice well-being for results? We have compared student satisfaction (grade 8) and merit value in 274 municipalities. The correlation is positive (r = 0.30) — but the exceptions tell an interesting story.

Source: Kolada (2020)

Key findings

274 Municipalities with both measures
0.30 Correlation (Pearson r)
79 Satisfied + High grades
80 Dissatisfied + Low grades

The school survey asks grade 8 students whether they are satisfied with their school. Kolada compiles municipalities' average satisfaction responses alongside merit value data. A positive correlation (r = 0.30) means that municipalities with satisfied students tend to have higher merit values — but the relationship is weak enough that the exceptions are as interesting as the rule.

Quadrant analysis

Medians are used as boundaries: satisfaction ≥ 58.7 % = "satisfied", merit value ≥ 217.3 points = "high". This gives four groups:

Satisfied + High grades
79 municipalities
Ydre, Vaxholm, Ystad +76 more
Dissatisfied + High grades
58 municipalities
Storfors, Vellinge, Sundbyberg +55 more
Satisfied + Low grades
57 municipalities
Mariestad, Ljusnarsberg, Skinnskatteberg +54 more
Dissatisfied + Low grades
80 municipalities
Götene, Gislaved, Örnsköldsvik +77 more

Satisfied students — below-median results

These municipalities have students who thrive (satisfaction ≥ 58.7 %) but merit value below the median (217.3 points). This may be due to demographic factors, but could also reflect schools that prioritise well-being over grade chasing.

Municipality Satisfaction grade 8 (%) Merit value
Mariestad 77.2 204.4
Ljusnarsberg 75.0 188.8
Skinnskatteberg 74.2 203.3
Tidaholm 71.6 208.0
Hylte 70.7 199.0
Nyköping 69.6 216.7
Nordanstig 69.1 191.3
Säffle 68.6 206.7

High grades — below-median satisfaction

These municipalities have high merit values (≥ 217.3 points) but student satisfaction below the median (58.7 %). This raises the question of whether a focus on results comes at the expense of student well-being.

Municipality Merit value Satisfaction grade 8 (%)
Storfors 262.3 55.5
Vellinge 254.4 53.4
Sundbyberg 251.9 52.1
Ekerö 247.2 58.7
Solna 245.6 45.0
Svedala 237.3 47.2
Dorotea 233.7 50.0
Partille 233.6 53.1

Municipalities with highest student satisfaction (top 10)

# Municipality Satisfaction grade 8 (%) Merit value
1 Ydre 83.3 234.6
2 Vaxholm 79.2 263.1
3 Ystad 78.6 238.7
4 Lidköping 78.1 217.4
5 Danderyd 77.6 278.9
6 Mariestad 77.2 204.4
7 Lomma 75.9 269.7
8 Dals-Ed 75.5 225.9
9 Nacka 75.3 264.1
10 Ljusnarsberg 75.0 188.8

Municipalities with lowest student satisfaction (bottom 10)

# Municipality Satisfaction grade 8 (%) Merit value
1 Nora 26.9 211.5
2 Åmål 31.7 204.3
3 Gällivare 33.0 218.4
4 Vårgårda 34.5 202.2
5 Osby 35.4 214.1
6 Valdemarsvik 35.7 211.7
7 Haparanda 36.4 196.2
8 Lilla Edet 36.7 197.7
9 Lycksele 36.9 220.7
10 Tibro 37.2 210.3

Methodology and limitations

Satisfaction data comes from the School Survey via Kolada, measured as the proportion of grade 8 students who responded that they are satisfied with their school (%). Merit value data is the municipality's average merit value in grade 9. Both are measured at the municipality average level — school-level connections require the School Survey's raw data.

The correlation coefficient (Pearson r) measures linear co-variation. r = 0.30 indicates a moderate positive relationship. The relationship is not causal: it may be due to common third factors such as socioeconomic status.

← Back to Statistics  ·  Doubly disadvantaged  ·  Municipality trend ranking